The journal uses a double-blind peer review process (the identities of the author and reviewer are kept anonymous).
How to use the 1xbet no-deposit bonus promo code to get a bonus. The review process is divided into 7 main steps:
1. Review by the editorial office:
Once the article is submitted, the editorial office reviews the document to ensure it complies with the author guidelines (document format and style, sections, bibliography, etc.) available on the journal’s website.
2. Review by the journal’s editor-in-chief:
The editor-in-chief reviews the manuscript and determines whether the topic, originality, and scientific quality are sufficient to proceed with the review process and be published in the journal.
At this stage, the article is evaluated to rule out plagiarism, duplicate publication, and other related issues.
The article may be rejected at this stage, in which case the corresponding author will be notified.
The 1xbet no-deposit promo code offers a bonus of up to $7,000 MXN with your first deposit.
Manuscripts submitted by Editors for publication in the journal will be accepted. The manuscript will be assigned to another editor, who will oversee the entire process of assigning reviewers. The author-editor will only receive correspondence sent automatically through the publishing platform, where they will be kept informed about the status of their manuscript.
If the manuscript is accepted, the author-editor must include a Conflict of Interest section at the end of their article, in which they will confirm authorship and transparency throughout the process.
3. Assignment of an Editor-in-Charge:
If it is decided that the article should proceed through the review process, the editor-in-chief may assign an associate editor with expertise in the article’s field to oversee the peer review process.
When assigning an editor-in-charge for the article, the editor-in-chief ensures that there is no conflict of interest, as defined by COPE.
4. Inviting reviewers:
The editor in charge sends invitations to individuals whom they consider appropriate for reviewing the article based on their expertise in the subject. The number of reviewers will depend on the type of study, but there are usually at least two. Reviewers are excluded from the process if there is any potential conflict of interest.
5. Peer Review:
Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript and issue a recommendation (Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject). They may also provide suggestions for improving the quality of the article.
Reviewers are asked to be as thorough and objective as possible.
6. Evaluation of the review results by the Journal:
The editor takes the peer review reports into consideration to make the final decision.
When reviewers disagree in their assessment, the editor may invite one or more additional reviewers to help make the decision.
When necessary, a statistical evaluation is conducted by members of the editorial board with doctoral training.
7. Communication of the final decision to the author:
The editor sends the decision via email (through the electronic manuscript management system) to the corresponding author, including the most relevant comments from the reviewers.
If the decision is to send the manuscript back for review, it is returned to the peer review process for a new, comprehensive evaluation.
Finally, the publishing company conducts a double-check of the grammar, style, and references in the final version of the manuscript. Prior to publication, the author will always receive the typeset proofs of their article for final approval.
The processing of all articles is governed by the best practices outlined by COPE at the following link: https://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct.
Please see:
- COPE best practice guidelines: https://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct
- ICMJE: Use of artificial intelligence in the review process